Clean Power, Healthy Communities was a Smashing Success

Subscribe to Local Clean Energy News and Alerts
Visit our new section on Prop 16: The PG&E Power Grab

Senate Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg wrote PG&E CEO Peter Darbee: Assembly Bill 117 (Migden) was enacted (Chapter 858, Statutes of 2002) with broad support, including the support of your company. This legislation prohibits utility company interference with [Community Choice Aggregation (CCA)] and requires utilities to "cooperate fully with any community choice aggregators that investigate, pursue, or implement community choice aggregation programs.” PG&E is aware that many communities are currently examining CCA. Your efforts to erect roadblocks to communities' pursuit of CCA can be interpreted as a violation of the statute. [Emphasis added]

 

 

Clean Power, Healthy Communities
A Regional Conference of the
Local Clean Energy Alliance

February 10 & 11, 2010
California Endowment 
Oakland, CA

The Clean Power Healthy Community conference was a smashing success thanks to our speakers, volunteers, and participants. Over 175 people participated over the two days and five working groups were created.  We will be posting the videos and slide decks shortly. Stay tuned...

* Climate Action Plans 
* Power Plants & Public Health 
* Green Collar Job Creation 
* Community Choice Energy 
* Policy & Financing 
* Creating a Local Power Grid 

Visit the Conference page  

Does PG&E Fully Understand the Recklessness of Peter Darbee's Proposition 16 Gamble?

SUNDAY, MARCH 7, 2010

I wrote the following "guest editorial" for the March 5 edition of the subscription newsletter, California Energy Circuit. Their deadline requirements prevented me from including the following statement which Peter Darbee made in response to a question at the March 1, 2010 PG&E investors conference in New York:
"There's going to be some flap. It will take place between now and June. And then the voters will have their ability to make their case one way or another. And then, presumably, you know, we'll mend any broken fences after that.”

By John Geesman

Silicon Valley cities fear PG&E power play

Friday, March 5, 2010
Silicon Valley / San Jose Business Journal - by David Goll

Officials in Silicon Valley cities with public power utilities are nervously eyeing a state proposition they say could stunt their ability to grow and generate sufficient revenue.

Proposition 16 on the June 8 ballot would amend the state Constitution to require local governments to obtain two-thirds voter approval to provide electricity to new customers or expand service. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. has pledged major financial backing for the measure.

How PG&E Uses Ratepayers' Money to Fund Its Political Warfare Against Compeition

[Below is Loretta Lynch's excellent description of how PG&E uses ratepayers' money to fund Prop 16, its efforts to squelch CCAs and public power, and its other political powergrabs and shenanigans. Loretta was Chair of California's Public Utilities Commission a decade ago, has been teaching at University of California at Berkeley, and is the author of a forthcoming book on energy politics in California. ~ Ed Mainland]

Former president of coalition opposing Marin Clean Energy says he supports local initiative

Richard Halstead
Posted: 03/04/2010 04:20:01 PM PST

The former president of a coalition that has sent five mailers to Marin residents slamming the Marin Clean Energy initiative says he no longer has anything to do with the group, and actually supports efforts such as Marin Clean Energy.
The Coalition for Reliable and Affordable Electricity's 2008 tax returns - the most recent available to the public - list Dan Richard, Pacific Gas and Electric Co.'s former senior vice president for public policy and government relations, as the coalition's president.

State of the California Feed-in Tariff

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 03, 2010

David Niebauer

A new, innovative feed-in tariff for small-scale solar development is coming to California. Rather than setting a fixed price in an environment in which technology costs appear to be dropping, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has proposed a market-based approach, allowing developers to bid the lowest prices at which they would be willing to develop projects. This approach focuses on adding capacity to meet California’s aggressive renewable portfolio standard (RPS), and appears to avoid the pitfall of setting a price that is too high or too low. Time will tell if the approach is effective, but the outline of the program released by the CPUC looks promising.

Mar. 11: Lisa Hoyos, California Coordinator of the Apollo Alliance

The LCEA has open meetings on the second Thursday of every month, featuring informative speakers on renewable energy, energy efficiency, and related efforts. 
 
The next meeting of alliance is March 11th at 6p and will feature a conversation with Lisa Hoyos, California Coordinator of the Apollo Alliance.

start date: 
03/11/2010 - 18:00
enddate: 
03/11/2010 - 20:00

The Cleveland Model

by Gar Alperovitz, Ted Howard & Thad Williamson

Something important is happening in Cleveland: a new model of
large-scale worker- and community-benefiting enterprises is beginning to build serious momentum in one of the cities most dramatically impacted by the nation's decaying economy. The Evergreen Cooperative Laundry (ECL)--a worker-owned, industrial-size, thoroughly "green" operation--opened its doors late last fall in Glenville, a neighborhood with a median income hovering around $18,000. It's the first of ten major enterprises in the works in Cleveland, where the poverty rate is more than 30 percent and the population has declined from 900,000 to less than 450,000 since 1950.

Prop 16 informational hearing at CPUC on March 17 1-5 pm. Show up! #prop16

Prop 16 informational hearing at CPUC on March 17 1-5 pm. California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Avenue, Commission Auditorium (Corner of Van Ness Avenue and McAllister Street) San Francisco If you want to testify contact Marzia Zafar at the CPUC at marzia.zafar@cpuc.ca.gov

start date: 
03/17/2010 - 13:00
enddate: 
03/17/2010 - 17:00

PG&E has long history of battling competitors

Posted at 10:20 PM on Thursday, Feb. 25, 2010
By Dan Walters / The Sacramento Bee

Sacramento-area voters, responding to a Sacramento Bee-led crusade, voted in 1923 to divorce themselves from Pacific Gas & Electric Co. and create a publicly owned electric utility, but it took 23 more years before Sacramento Municipal Utility District began serving customers.

Why so long? PG&E fought a rear-guard action to delay the SMUD takeover, before finally losing in a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case.

Nearly a century later, PG&E still is resisting efforts to create publicly owned utilities, beating back several public power campaigns in San Francisco and, most recently, an effort to expand SMUD's territory into adjacent Yolo County.

Syndicate content